European Monetary System
on a tender procedure. The tender may be a fixed rate tender, with
counterparties bidding amounts, or a floating rate tender, where
counterparties propose bids including both amounts and interest rates.
Second, there is the monthly longer term refinancing operation, which
has a maturity of three months and will always take the form of an interest
rate tender. This is because the ECB will avoid signalling its monetary
policy stance through these particular operations.
The ECB will also conduct fine-tuning operations, through the
national central banks of the euro area or, in exceptional circumstances,
on its own account. Fine tuning operations will be conducted whenever
liquidity or money market conditions warrant. Fine tuning operations may
take the form of reverse repurchase transactions (that is, the same type of
transaction as that used in the main refinancing and the longer term
refinancing operations, but with no pre-set start date nor a pre-set
maturity), foreign exchange swaps or the taking of fixed-term deposits.
Fine tuning operations in the form of reverse repurchase operations may be
executed either through quick tenders or bilaterally. In both cases, these
operations will involve a limited set of eligible counterparties that have
an appropriate track record of activity in the money market. The other
types of fine tuning operations will also be executed with a limited number
of eligible counterparties, which will be selected ex ante by the ECB. In
some countries, there will be a rotation scheme, which will aim at giving
the opportunity to all eligible fine tuning counterparties to participate
in fine tuning operations.
Finally, open market operations may also be conducted whenever
structural reasons, such as the longer-term evolution of liquidity
profiles, warrant it. These so-called structural operations may take the
form of outright purchases or sales of securities or the issuance of debt
certificates by the ECB.
4.2 Standing facilities
The ECB will operate two overnight standing facilities, which will be
available to all credit institutions at national central banks of the euro
area, provided that, when using the marginal lending facility, they have
sufficient collateral. The rate of the marginal lending facility will
constitute the upper bound of collateralised overnight money market rates.
The deposit facility will be remunerated at a rate that will constitute the
lower bound of overnight money market rates.
When using the marginal lending facility, or, for that matter, when
entering in liquidity-providing open market operations in the form of
reverse transactions, counterparties have to post assets with their
national central bank (or the ECB in the exceptional case when the ECB
conducts fine tuning operations on its own account). These assets are meant
to act as guarantees for credits received from the European System of
Central Banks. A list of eligible assets has been drawn up for this
purpose. The list comprises a wide variety of assets and has two sub-sets.
First, the so-called tier one assets, which are selected by the ECB
according to uniform criteria relating to their credit standing in the
whole euro area. Second, the so-called tier two assets, which have been
selected by the ECB because they are of particular importance for certain
national banking systems of the euro area, in order to promote a certain
degree of continuity at the start of the Stage Three of EMU. Two principles
of equal treatment are applied, however. First, the credit standing of tier
two assets is as high as that of tier one assets. Second, both tier one and
tier two assets may be used by any credit institution in the euro area,
irrespective of its location.
In addition, a set of risk control measures has been elaborated to
ensure that, for any counterparty, the amount of assets provided is always
sufficient. Risk control measures cover the assets' price and credit risks,
taking account of the asset type, its characteristics and the maturity of
the transaction. The ECB's risk control measures have been elaborated with
careful attention to the best market practices in this area. They include
the deduction of haircuts from the assets and the imposition of initial
margins to the credit amount. Another feature of the risk control framework
is the regular revaluations of the assets, which will, in most cases, take
place daily and may trigger margin calls, most often to be settled through
delivery of additional assets.
4.3 Minimum reserve system
The ECB will also apply a minimum reserve system to credit
institutions of the euro area. Two main monetary policy objectives have
been assigned to the minimum reserve system. The first objective is to
stabilise money market interest rates through the averaging mechanism,
whereby the fulfilment of minimum reserve requirements is based on average
reserve holdings over monthly periods of time. During the maintenance
period, this allows the banking system to absorb liquidity shocks. The
reduced volatility of money market rates will reduce the need for frequent
fine tuning operations, which will mean that markets are less distorted by
central bank interventions than they would otherwise be. The second
objective of the minimum reserve system is to enlarge the demand for
central bank money, so as to enlarge the liquidity deficit of the banking
system vis-а-vis the ESCB. This will safeguard the role of the European
System of Central Banks as a provider of liquidity to the banking system.
Reserve requirements will be calculated by applying a reserve ratio
of 1.5% to 2.5% to the deposits, debt securities and money market paper
issued by credit institutions, except for residual maturities above two
years. Although repurchase agreements are included in the reserve base,
they will be subject to a zero reserve ratio. In 1999\SCHD-MAY.DOCf[pic]1 T-
-#"+ !-+ 1999\PROT10.DOCfter-bank liabilities and liabilities vis-а-vis
the ESCB will not be subject to reserve requirements. An allowance of the
order of E 100,000 will be deducted from reserve requirements, so that
credit institutions with a small reserve base will not have to hold minimum
reserves.
Reserve holdings will be remunerated up to the required reserve
level, at the rate of the main refinancing operation (as averaged over a
month). It may be argued that a less than full remuneration of minimum
reserves would increase the interest rate elasticity of central bank money
demand. This notwithstanding, the ECB has decided in favour of a full
remuneration of minimum reserves in view of the distortion to efficient
markets that a less than full remuneration would have implied. As a result
of the full remuneration of minimum reserves, the European Central Bank has
also decided not to exempt any credit institution from the minimum reserve
system.
4.4 Procedures
The ECB will have many counterparties and be subject to close public
scrutiny. It has therefore set up procedures for informing its
counterparties and the public about its monetary policy instruments in a
robust and transparent manner.
The ECB will inform its counterparties and the public through a
document detailing its monetary policy instruments and procedures and
through the regular publication of various materials on its Internet site.
General Documentation
The ECB has produced a document describing its monetary policy
instruments and procedures in detail. This is called "General Documentation
on ESCB Monetary Policy Instruments and Procedures". A revised version of
this document was published recently. This revised version includes all the
newly specified elements of the monetary policy framework of the ECB,
including for instance the minimum reserve system. This document also
includes a calendar for the standard tender operations in 1999 (both main
refinancing and longer term refinancing operations). Calendars of standard
tender operations will be published by the ECB every year.
Publications on the ECB's Internet site
The list of assets that are eligible as guarantees for liquidity
providing operations will be made public on the Internet site of the ECB.
The list will be updated on a weekly basis and users will be able to
subscribe to an e-mailing facility for receiving certain designated parts
of the list on a regular basis. Users will also be able to query the list,
which will contain a large number of assets.
The list of institutions subject to minimum reserves, that is, credit
institutions established in the euro area, will also be available on the
Internet site of the ECB, together with the list of all monetary and
financial institutions in the European Union.
5. Concluding remarks
We are less than three months away from the moment when monetary
policy sovereignty is transferred from the NCBs to the ESCB. The bulk of
the preparatory work has already been completed, but major decisions -
above all, the choice of a monetary policy strategy - still have to be
made. The public can be certain that we will always inform them, regularly
and comprehensively, about our considerations and deliberations. We will
make all our decisions transparent. I have no doubt that we will be well
prepared for the moment at which we take over responsibility for monetary
policy in the euro area.
The euro as an international currency
Speech delivered by Eugenio Domingo Solans,
Member of the Governing Council and the Executive Board of the
European Central Bank,
at The Athens Summit '99,
in Athens on 18 September 1999
Thank you for inviting me to the Athens Summit '99 and for giving
me the opportunity to speak to you at this important event.
I should like to share with you my views, and the ECB's views, on
the importance of the euro as an international currency. I understand
that this issue may be of interest to experts from Greece, a "pre-in"
country which intends to join the euro area, and to many participants
from countries outside the euro area and the European Union, some of
which currently have exchange rate regimes related to the euro.
Nowadays the euro is the second most widely used currency in the
world economy, behind the US dollar and ahead of the Japanese yen. As
we all know, any currency fulfils three basic functions: it is a store
of value, a medium of exchange and a unit of account. As a store of
value the use of the euro as an investment and financing currency is
rapidly increasing, as investors understand the advisability of
diversifying their portfolio currencies among those which are more
stable and more internationally used. The euro is developing at a
slower pace as a medium of exchange or payment currency in the
international exchange of goods and services. This fact can easily be
explained by the combined and reinforcing effects of network
externalities and economies of scale in the use of a predominant
international currency as a medium of exchange, as is the case with
the US dollar. The use of the euro as a unit of account is linked to
its use as a store of value and a medium of exchange. The value
stored in euro or the payments made in euro will tend to be counted in
euro.
There are good reasons to expect an increase in international
public use of the euro as a reserve, intervention and pegging
currency, inasmuch as the public authorities understand that it is
worthwhile to allocate their foreign reserves among the main
international currencies and to give the euro a relevant share in
accordance with its internal and external stability and the economic
and financial importance of the euro area.
In connection with the use of the euro as a pegging currency,
approximately 30 countries outside the euro area currently have
exchange rate regimes involving the euro to a greater or lesser
extent. These exchange rate regimes are currency boards (Bosnia-
Herzegovina, Bulgaria, Estonia); currencies pegged to the euro
(Cyprus, the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia and 14 African
countries in which the CFA franc is the legal tender); currencies
pegged to a basket of currencies including the euro, in some cases
with a fluctuation band (Hungary, Iceland, Poland, Turkey, etc.);
systems of managed floating in which the euro is used informally as
the reference currency (Czech Republic, Slovak Republic and Slovenia);
and, last but not least, European Union currencies pegged to the euro
through a co-operative arrangement, namely ERM II. As you well know,
Denmark and Greece joined ERM II on 1 January 1999 with a ±2.25%
fluctuation band for the Danish krone and a ±15% fluctuation band for
the Greek drachma. Although the euro remains in second position after
the US dollar in terms of its official use, the role of the euro will
increase in the future, without a doubt, especially after the year
2002 when the euro banknotes and coins will begin to circulate.
Taking the current situation as a starting point, the
Eurosystem's position concerning the future international role of the
euro is crystal clear: we shall not adopt a belligerent stance in
order to force the use of the euro upon the world economy. We are
convinced that the use of the euro as an international currency will
come about anyway. It will happen spontaneously, slowly but
inexorably, without any impulses other than those based on free will
and the decisions of market participants, without any logic other than
that of the market. In other words, the internationalisation of the
euro is not a policy objective of the Eurosystem; it will neither be
fostered nor hindered by us. The development of the euro as an
international currency will be a market-driven process, a free
process.
The euro fulfils the necessary conditions to be a leading
international currency with the US dollar and not against it. There is
enough room for both currencies in the world economy. The necessary
conditions for a currency to become an international currency are
based on two broad factors: low risk and large size. The low risk
factor is related to the confidence inspired by the currency and its
central bank, which in turn mainly depends on the internal and
external stability of the currency. The low risk factor tends to lead
to diversification among international currencies, since
diversification is a means to reduce the overall risk; it acts, so to
speak, as a centrifugal force. By contrast, the large size factor
relates to the relative demographic economic and financial importance
of the area which supports the currency; in other words, the "habitat"
of the currency. The large size factor, which concerns the
demographic, economic and financial dimension, generally tends to lead
to centralisation around one or a few key international currencies. It
can be seen as a centripetal force, as a virtuous circle, which will
tend to lead to an increasing use of the euro as an international
currency. Let us consider these two factors in more detail.
The first factor concerns low risk, credibility and stability.
The stability of the euro is a priority for the ECB. Compared with the
idea of stability, the strength of the euro is of lesser importance.
This does not mean that the exchange rate of the euro does not
constitute an element to be considered in the second pillar of the
monetary policy strategy of the ECB, which consists of a broadly based
assessment of the outlook for price developments and risks to
stability obtained from a wide range of economic indicators, the euro
exchange rate being one of them. However, the basic factor that will
determine the importance of the euro as a widely used currency in the
world economy, in addition to the demographic, economic and financial
dimensions of the euro area, is, without a doubt, the stability of the
new currency, understood as a means to maintain the purchasing power
of savings.
Stability is the basic requirement for a good currency. It is
what we at the ECB want for the euro. We want a stable euro and we are
convinced that, in the long term, the euro will derive strength from
its stability.
The stability of the euro is the basis for the confidence in and
the credibility of the ECB, without which a large international role
for the euro would be unthinkable. Stability is the proof of the
effectiveness of the institution. Yet in order to be credible it is
not sufficient for the ECB to maintain stability. Other parameters of
its action must be considered: accountability, transparency and
communication, a Europe-wide perspective, etc.
These parameters or conditions for the credibility of the euro
are certainly demanding. However, the achievement of these conditions
is the aim of all those of us who have responsibilities with regard to
the functioning of the Eurosystem.
The second factor, which we have called the large size factor or
the habitat of the euro, is important because without a certain
critical mass, a currency cannot have international relevance, however
high its degree of stability.
The figures relating to the population and the GDP of the euro
area illustrate this. With 292 million inhabitants, its population
exceeds that of the United States (270 million) and that of Japan (127
million). The GDP of the euro area is, on the other hand, equal to 76%
of the GDP of the United States (EUR 5,774 billion compared with EUR
7,592 billion), though it is higher than that of Japan (EUR 3,327
billion). The source of this information, which refers to 1998, is
Eurostat.
However, even more important than the current figures is the
potential for the future development of the euro area, in terms of
population and GDP, if and when the so-called "pre-ins" (Denmark,
Greece, Sweden and the United Kingdom) join the Eurosystem.
The entry of these countries would result in a monetary area of
376 million inhabitants, 39% larger than the United States and almost
triple the size of Japan, with a GDP of EUR 7,495 billion, only
Страницы: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19
|