European Monetary System
European Monetary System
European Monetary System and European Currency
Based on selected papers kindly provided by the European Central Bank
Compiled by Dm. Evstafiev
for the students of the School of Political Science
at St. Petersburg State University
St. Petersburg
1999
Developments in the Financial Sector in Europe
following the Introduction of the Euro
Speech by Dr. Willem F. Duisenberg,
President of the European Central Bank,
to be delivered at the Third European Financial Markets Convention
Milan, 3 June 1999
1. Introduction
The period of the five months following the introduction of the euro
has been very rich in new events, with significant developments taking
place both in the continental securities markets and in the financial
system as a whole. Although experience has been gathered over a relatively
short period of time, I am tempted to make two observations of a
fundamental nature.
The first observation is that developments following the
introduction of the euro do not imply that the euro area is set to become a
financial fortress whose financial markets and institutions would be cut
off from the rest of the world. In fact, market participants residing
outside the euro area seem to be taking a keen interest in the financial
markets of the euro area. "Core Europe", so to speak, has become more
interesting to outsiders as the breadth and liquidity of its financial
markets has increased.
The second observation is that the euro can be expected to have a
significant influence on the structure of the financial system by bringing
about more securitisation. A traditional feature of the financial system of
continental Europe has been a marked dependency on the funds intermediated
by banks. This feature contrasts with the financial system of the United
States which is much more securitised. For instance, corporate bonds have
not been very widely issued in the euro area, and stock market
capitalisation - relative to the size of the economy - is much lower in the
euro area than in the United States. There are good reasons to believe that
a process of securitisation will gather pace in the euro area now that the
single currency is in use. This view seems to be shared by many observers
and I shall, in the course of my remarks, provide some arguments in its
favour.
In my remarks today, I should like to discuss the structural changes
in the financial sector, in particular those that have occurred as a result
of the launch of new product types and the changing nature of public and
private institutions. I shall address developments in the money markets,
the bond markets and the equity markets as well as the process of
adaptation of banking institutions to their new environment.
2. Money markets
The money markets of the euro area became rapidly integrated after
the introduction of the euro despite the fact that their structures had
previously been quite different at the national level. Transaction volumes
and measures of bid-ask spreads on the various money market instruments
both indicate that the markets reached a very high level of liquidity very
rapidly in the course of January 1999 and have subsequently retained it.
The high degree of integration of the euro area money markets is,
first of all, a result of the single monetary policy, which is conducted
through the harmonised operational framework of the Eurosystem. This
integration has also been made possible by the significant and increasing
integration of payment systems. Cross-border payments processed by TARGET
accounted for more than 37% of the value of all real-time payments
(domestic and cross-border) effected by credit institutions in March and
April 1999. Moreover, the continuously high use which our counterparties
make of the correspondent central banking model (or CCBM) for the cross-
border transfer of collateral in monetary policy operations is an important
indication of area-wide integration. This is evidenced by the fact that
cross-border collateral currently represents around 25% of the total amount
of collateral in custody in the context of the Eurosystem's monetary policy
operations.
Taking a closer look at the various instruments traded in the money
markets, a feature that is worthy of note is that market participants in
the 11 countries of the euro area have shown an increasing tendency to
demonstrate a similar reliance on each instrument type. For example, what
we call "overnight indexed swaps", which are swaps indexed on the overnight
reference interest rate EONIA, have become an important derivative
instrument in the money markets of the euro area. This can be seen from the
low level of quoted bid-ask spreads and the high turnover relative to other
major international markets. Both indicators show a high level of liquidity
in this instrument. Another type of instrument of interest in the money
market (but also at the fringe of the bond market) is that of the
repurchase agreement. The development of more integrated repo markets in
the euro area will obviously accompany the development of area-wide
securities trading, settlement and custody systems. This will reduce
transaction costs and improve efficiency for the cross-border transfer of
securities through repurchase operations.
Looking ahead, other developments in the money markets are expected
in the coming months. There are aims to establish new area-wide standards
for the repo markets, with a view to overcoming the separation between
different models in the national markets. These new standards could
obviously co-exist with other standards and broader conventions for
international transactions. In fact, over the last few months the European
Central Bank (ECB) has been examining whether this co-existence could
affect the integration of money markets. We have come to the conclusion
that, in particular owing to the efforts of the sponsors of the different
standards, this should not be considered a threat.
Finally, it should also be noted that national and international
central securities depositories are currently developing links with one
another, which will enable participants in one country to make direct use
of securities deposited in other countries. Twenty-six of these links
(concerning mainly Belgium, Germany, France, Luxembourg, the Netherlands,
Austria and Finland) may be used by the Eurosystem.
3. Bond markets
I should now like to turn to bond markets and first to comment on
the position of euro area bond markets in the global market. Some data
sources on international securities issuance available so far show a
pattern of increased reliance on euro-denominated bonds at the beginning of
1999, in particular as opposed to US dollar-denominated bonds. While it
remains difficult to draw firm conclusions on the determinants of bond
denomination choices without considering information on the nature of bond
holdings and trading patterns, recent bond issuance volumes indicate that
the euro has the potential to become an important currency for
international bond issuance.
The importance of the euro area bond market is also apparent in
measures of secondary market activity, i.e. turnover or trading volumes. In
particular, trading volumes on exchange-traded bond futures are indicative
of the overall degree of market activity. Volumes traded in euro-
denominated bond futures were low shortly before the changeover to the
euro, when the bond markets in the euro area were exceptionally quiet.
Since then, volumes have increased markedly and they currently stand at
consistently high levels, which indicates a continuously high degree of
turnover in euro-denominated bond markets in general.
Turning to the internal structure of the bond markets of the euro
area, I should like to make an initial observation related to the recent
marked increase in euro-denominated corporate bond issuance, which was
accompanied by an increase in the average size of issues. This tendency is
likely to continue in the future, in particular to the extent that bonds
may be used by firms to finance increasing mergers and acquisitions
activity in the euro area. The underlying reasons for increased bond
issuance by euro area firms are clear, both on the supply and on the demand
side. On the supply side, large firms with good credit ratings will find
opportunities in the increased depth and liquidity of the euro area bond
market. On the demand side, the respect by governments of the parameters of
the Stability and Growth Pact over the medium term should leave more room
for the private sector to issue debt securities. In addition, the euro area
must be in a position to save in order to be able to take care of its
future pension payments, and a part of these savings is likely to be
invested in corporate debt securities. An increase in global demand for
euro-denominated debt securities is also expected as the euro becomes a
major reserve currency. Moreover, the demand for higher risk euro-
denominated debt securities is likely to increase, particularly as the
current low level of sovereign yields increases incentives to search for
higher yields.
With regard to the government bond markets, an issue of importance
for the euro area that I should like to stress is the fact that governments
now find themselves in a rather new position as issuers. This reflects a
number of developments, two of which I should particularly like to mention.
First, the major public issuers have attempted to position themselves as
providers of benchmarks for euro-denominated bond markets. Second, certain
issues of government bonds have effectively gained larger portions of
secondary markets, in particular in relation to developments that have
occurred on bond futures markets.
Market participants have responded to these developments in the bond
markets with a range of concurring or competing initiatives and alliances.
In the derivatives industry, market participants have established new
alliances. On the trading side, electronic cross-border platforms for bonds
have been created or are in the process of being developed. On the clearing
side, integrated platforms for different markets have been launched or are
being finalised, while, finally, on the securities settlement side,
initiatives have also been launched. It is important to note that while
some of these developments are internal to the euro area, others aim at
creating links with financial markets outside the euro area. One may
reasonably expect that all of these new circuits, as well as others, may in
the future be enlarged to encompass a growing number of market
participants.
4. Equity markets
Turning to equity markets, structural developments of most interest
relate to the infrastructure of stock exchanges on the one hand and equity
derivative exchanges on the other. First, within the euro area, equity
investment and trading activities appear to be less and less influenced by
country-specific factors and increasingly subject to area-wide
considerations. Consistent with this development, area-wide equity indices
have been developing. Market participants are showing considerable interest
in these area-wide indices, in particular as they are also now adopting
investment positions on area-wide industrial sectors, using the sub-indices
made available for that purpose. An indication of the degree of interest
raised by area-wide indices is the relatively fierce competition for
benchmark status that has developed between the various proponents of area-
wide indices.
Second, market developments in relation to stock index futures and
options will reflect the rise of area-wide indices. This may in turn lead
to either consolidation or product specialisation of equity derivative
exchanges. For my part, I consider the development of fair competition
between exchanges to be a positive factor in terms of the improvement of
the range of products and services available to the financial industry.
Third, in the equity market the euro has also provided a powerful
incentive for the creation of new - and possibly competing - alliances
among exchanges. Before the launch of the single currency, circuits had
been created for the launch of integrated "new markets" within and beyond
the euro area, encompassing the shares of small and medium-sized companies
with a high potential for growth. The development in the integration of
exchanges has also continued more recently, and, as you know, it has not
been limited to the euro area.
5. Banking
In the field of banking, the securitisation trend appears to demand
strategic and organisational adjustment on the part of banks. The relative
importance of the more traditional types of banking activity can be seen to
be decreasing, even though it should be mentioned that traditional banking
activities have nonetheless continued to grow at a rate exceeding that of
growth of nominal GDP. In the euro area, growth in recent years has been
much more rapid in assets under the management of mutual funds and other
institutional investors than in the assets of banks. This reflects a
tendency towards decreasing the relative weight of bank deposits compared
with securities in financial wealth.
The euro area banking industry has reacted to this development
already by diversifying into the asset management area. Banking groups have
been able to "internalise" a significant part of the securitisation
tendency as they control a large majority of the mutual funds. As a result
of the securitisation trend, there has been an increase in the share of
security holdings among bank assets, and an increase in the share of
capital gains - although those are quite cyclically sensitive - as well as
in fee income stemming from asset management services. Meanwhile, the
relative importance of interest income has declined correspondingly. At the
bank level, dividend income from equity participations has generally become
much more important, indicating an increase in the importance of the profit
generated by non-bank subsidiaries.
Beside the establishment of non-bank subsidiaries, there have been
other strategic and organisational changes that have resulted in banks
strengthening their securities-related activities. In particular,
significant motives behind the recent merger trend seem to include the
desire to increase bank size and hence to be able to operate efficiently in
wholesale securities markets as well as to be able to cater for the needs
of large international corporations for investment banking services.
The trend towards securitisation can be regarded as one of the
reasons for the structural changes in the banking system that appears to
have accelerated recently. There have naturally also been other reasons why
banks have sought to merge, predominantly the need to cut capacity and to
reduce costs. These cost-driven mergers have taken place primarily among
smaller banks.
6. Conclusion
In my remarks today, I have referred to a number of changes and
market initiatives in the euro area financial landscape. These developments
point to the increasing importance of the fixed income and equity markets
that many expected in Stage Three of Economic and Monetary Union (EMU),
providing new opportunities for borrowers and investors and causing
pressure to adjust for financial institutions. In this respect, I should
like to mention the importance of removing the remaining regulatory
barriers to the further development of the securities markets. To this end,
the European Commission has recently published an Action Plan of regulatory
changes to improve the single market for financial services that would
certainly - when implemented - boost the integration and market-driven
development of the European securities markets.
Finally, I should like to conclude with some remarks about the role
of the Eurosystem (the term that we use to mean the ECB and the 11 national
central banks of the Member States participating in Stage Three of EMU) in
the developments in the financial sector in Europe. First of all, the
Eurosystem contributes to developments in the financial sector by providing
it with a stable and credible monetary policy. With a strong and credible
commitment to its primary objective, price stability, the Eurosystem has
created a situation in which the financial sector can concentrate on those
issues that are of the greatest relevance to its activities.
The Eurosystem does not play a direct role in structural
developments in the financial sector. With its single monetary policy
framework and TARGET in particular, the Eurosystem has created an
infrastructure that has proved to be useful for the establishment of an
integrated money market in the euro area.
In addition, the Eurosystem carefully monitors structural
developments in the financial sector to the extent that they might have an
impact on the conduct of monetary policy. To make a final point, in
observing developments in the financial sector, the Eurosystem constantly
takes account of the fact that one of its tasks, laid down in the Treaty
establishing the European Community, is to "contribute to the smooth
conduct of policies pursued by the competent authorities relating to (…)
the stability of the financial system" [(Article 105 (5))]. Analysis of the
common developments in the European financial system represents such a
contribution.
***
Economic and Monetary Union in Europe - the challenges ahead
Speech by Professor Dr. L.H. Hoogduin,
on behalf of Dr. Willem F. Duisenberg,
President of the European Central Bank,
at the symposium sponsored by the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas
City
on "New challenges for monetary policy"
on 27 August 1999 in Jackson Hole, Wyoming
From the European perspective, the title of this year's Jackson Hole
symposium - "new challenges for monetary policy" - is particularly
appropriate. Economic and Monetary Union (EMU) in Europe is a unique
project and its consummation with the introduction of the single monetary
policy on 1 January 1999 took place less than eight months ago. Today,
given the time available, I will not endeavour to review all the challenges
which are raised by EMU comprehensively. I shall have to be selective,
Страницы: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19
|