Many Americans, including
parents and business leaders, are also alarmed by what they see as inadequate
levels of student achievement in subjects such as reading, mathematics, and
science. On many standardized tests, American students lag behind their
counterparts in Europe and Asia. In response, some Americans have urged the
adoption of national standards by which individual schools can be evaluated.
Some have supported more rigorous teacher competency standards. Another
response that became popular in the 1990s is the creation of charter schools.
These schools are directly authorized by the state and receive public funding,
but they operate largely outside the control of local school districts. Parents
and teachers enforce self-defined standards for these charter schools.
Schools are also working to
incorporate computers into classrooms. The need for computer literacy in the
21st century has put an additional strain on school budgets and local
resources. Schools have struggled to catch up by providing computer equipment
and instruction and by making Internet connections available. Some companies,
including Apple Computer, Inc., have provided computer equipment to help
schools meet their students’ computer-education needs.
Concerns in Higher Education
Throughout the 20th century,
Americans have attended schools to obtain the economic and social rewards that
come with highly technical or skilled work and advanced degrees. However, as
the United States became more diverse, people debated how to include different
groups, such as women and minorities, into higher education. Blacks have
historically been excluded from many white institutions, or were made to feel
unwelcome. Since the 19th century, a number of black colleges have existed to
compensate for this broad social bias, including federally chartered and funded
Howard University. In the early 20th century, when Jews and other Eastern
Europeans began to apply to universities, some of the most prestigious colleges
imposed quotas limiting their numbers.
Americans tried various means
to eliminate the most egregious forms of discrimination. In the early part of
the century, "objective" admissions tests were introduced to
counteract the bias in admissions. Some educators now view admissions tests
such as the Scholastic Achievement Test (SAT), originally created to simplify
admissions testing for prestigious private schools, as disadvantageous to women
and minorities. Critics of the SAT believed the test did not adequately account
for differences in social and economic background. Whenever something as
subjective as ability or merit is evaluated, and when the rewards are
potentially great, people hotly debate the best means to fairly evaluate these
criteria.
Until the middle of the 20th
century, most educational issues in the United States were handled locally.
After World War II, however, the federal government began to assume a new
obligation to assure equality in educational opportunity, and this issue began
to affect college admissions standards. In the last quarter of the 20th
century, the government increased its role in questions relating to how all
Americans could best secure equal access to education.
Schools had problems providing
equal opportunities for all because quality, costs, and admissions criteria
varied greatly. To deal with these problems, the federal government introduced
the policy of affirmative action in education in the early 1970s. Affirmative
action required that colleges and universities take race, ethnicity, and gender
into account in admissions to provide extra consideration to those who have
historically faced discrimination. It was intended to assure that Americans of
all backgrounds have an opportunity to train for professions in fields such as
medicine, law, education, and business administration.
Affirmative action became a
general social commitment during the last quarter of the 20th century. In
education, it meant that universities and colleges gave extra advantages and
opportunities to blacks, Native Americans, women, and other groups that were
generally underrepresented at the highest levels of business and in other
professions. Affirmative action also included financial assistance to members
of minorities who could not otherwise afford to attend colleges and universities.
Affirmative action has allowed many minority members to achieve new prominence
and success.
At the end of the 20th century,
the policy of affirmative action was criticized as unfair to those who were
denied admission in order to admit those in designated group categories. Some
considered affirmative action policies a form of reverse discrimination, some
believed that special policies were no longer necessary, and others believed
that only some groups should qualify (such as African Americans because of the
nation’s long history of slavery and segregation). The issue became a matter of
serious discussion and is one of the most highly charged topics in education
today. In the 1990s three states—Texas, California, and Washington—eliminated
affirmative action in their state university admissions policies.
Several other issues have become troubling to higher
education. Because tuition costs have risen to very high levels, many smaller
private colleges and universities are struggling to attract students. Many students
and their parents choose state universities where costs are much lower. The
decline in federal research funds has also caused financial difficulties to
many universities. Many well-educated students, including those with doctoral
degrees, have found it difficult to find and keep permanent academic jobs, as
schools seek to lower costs by hiring part-time and temporary faculty. As a
result, despite its great strengths and its history of great variety, the
expense of American higher education may mean serious changes in the future.
Education is fundamental to
American culture in more ways than providing literacy and job skills.
Educational institutions are the setting where scholars interpret and pass on
the meaning of the American experience. They analyze what America is as a society by interpreting the nation’s past and defining objectives for the
future. That information eventually forms the basis for what children learn
from teachers, textbooks, and curricula. Thus, the work of educational
institutions is far more important than even job training, although this is
usually foremost in people’s minds.
ARTS AND LETTERS
The arts, more than other
features of culture, provide avenues for the expression of imagination and
personal vision. They offer a range of emotional and intellectual pleasures to
consumers of art and are an important way in which a culture represents itself.
There has long been a Western tradition distinguishing those arts that appeal
to the multitude, such as popular music, from those—such as classical
orchestral music—normally available to the elite of learning and taste. Popular
art forms are usually seen as more representative American products. In the United States in the recent past, there has been a blending of popular and elite art forms,
as all the arts experienced a period of remarkable cross-fertilization. Because
popular art forms are so widely distributed, arts of all kinds have prospered.
The arts in the United States express the many faces and the enormous creative range of the American
people. Especially since World War II, American innovations and the immense
energy displayed in literature, dance, and music have made American cultural
works world famous. Arts in the United States have become internationally
prominent in ways that are unparalleled in history. American art forms during
the second half of the 20th century often defined the styles and qualities that
the rest of the world emulated. At the end of the 20th century, American art
was considered equal in quality and vitality to art produced in the rest of the
world.
Throughout the 20th century,
American arts have grown to incorporate new visions and voices. Much of this
new artistic energy came in the wake of America’s emergence as a superpower
after World War II. But it was also due to the growth of New York City as an
important center for publishing and the arts, and the immigration of artists
and intellectuals fleeing fascism in Europe before and during the war. An
outpouring of talent also followed the civil rights and protest movements of
the 1960s, as cultural discrimination against blacks, women, and other groups
diminished.
American arts flourish in many
places and receive support from private foundations, large corporations, local
governments, federal agencies, museums, galleries, and individuals. What is
considered worthy of support often depends on definitions of quality and of
what constitutes art. This is a tricky subject when the popular arts are
increasingly incorporated into the domain of the fine arts and new forms such
as performance art and conceptual art appear. As a result, defining what is art
affects what students are taught about past traditions (for example, Native
American tent paintings, oral traditions, and slave narratives) and what is
produced in the future. While some practitioners, such as studio artists, are
more vulnerable to these definitions because they depend on financial support
to exercise their talents, others, such as poets and photographers, are less
immediately constrained.
Artists operate in a world
where those who theorize and critique their work have taken on an increasingly
important role. Audiences are influenced by a variety of
intermediaries—critics, the schools, foundations that offer grants, the
National Endowment for the Arts, gallery owners, publishers, and theater
producers. In some areas, such as the performing arts, popular audiences may
ultimately define success. In other arts, such as painting and sculpture,
success is far more dependent on critics and a few, often wealthy, art
collectors. Writers depend on publishers and on the public for their success.
Unlike their predecessors, who
relied on formal criteria and appealed to aesthetic judgments, critics at the
end of the 20th century leaned more toward popular tastes, taking into account
groups previously ignored and valuing the merger of popular and elite forms.
These critics often relied less on aesthetic judgments than on social measures
and were eager to place artistic productions in the context of the time and social
conditions in which they were created. Whereas earlier critics attempted to
create an American tradition of high art, later critics used art as a means to
give power and approval to nonelite groups who were previously not considered
worthy of including in the nation’s artistic heritage.
Not so long ago, culture and
the arts were assumed to be an unalterable inheritance—the accumulated wisdom
and highest forms of achievement that were established in the past. In the 20th
century generally, and certainly since World War II, artists have been boldly
destroying older traditions in sculpture, painting, dance, music, and
literature. The arts have changed rapidly, with one movement replacing another
in quick succession.
Visual Arts
The visual arts have traditionally
included forms of expression that appeal to the eyes through painted surfaces,
and to the sense of space through carved or molded materials. In the 19th
century, photographs were added to the paintings, drawings, and sculpture that
make up the visual arts. The visual arts were further augmented in the 20th
century by the addition of other materials, such as found objects. These
changes were accompanied by a profound alteration in tastes, as earlier
emphasis on realistic representation of people, objects, and landscapes made
way for a greater range of imaginative forms.
During the late 19th and early
20th centuries, American art was considered inferior to European art. Despite
noted American painters such as Thomas Eakins, Winslow Homer, Mary Cassatt, and
John Marin, American visual arts barely had an international presence.
American art began to flourish
during the Great Depression of the 1930s as New Deal government programs
provided support to artists along with other sectors of the population. Artists
connected with each other and developed a sense of common purpose through
programs of the Public Works Administration, such as the Federal Art Project,
as well as programs sponsored by the Treasury Department. Most of the art of
the period, including painting, photography, and mural work, focused on the
plight of the American people during the depression, and most artists painted
real people in difficult circumstances. Artists such as Thomas Hart Benton and
Ben Shahn expressed the suffering of ordinary people through their
representations of struggling farmers and workers. While artists such as Benton
and Grant Wood focused on rural life, many painters of the 1930s and 1940s
depicted the multicultural life of the American city. Jacob Lawrence, for example,
re-created the history and lives of African Americans. Other artists, such as
Andrew Wyeth and Edward Hopper, tried to use human figures to describe
emotional states such as loneliness and despair.
Abstract Expressionism
Shortly after World War II,
American art began to garner worldwide attention and admiration. This change
was due to the innovative fervor of abstract expressionism in the 1950s and to
subsequent modern art movements and artists. The abstract expressionists of the
mid-20th century broke from the realist and figurative tradition set in the
1930s. They emphasized their connection to international artistic visions
rather than the particularities of people and place, and most abstract
expressionists did not paint human figures (although artist Willem de Kooning
did portrayals of women). Color, shape, and movement dominated the canvases of
abstract expressionists. Some artists broke with the Western art tradition by
adopting innovative painting styles—during the 1950s Jackson Pollock "painted"
by dripping paint on canvases without the use of brushes, while the paintings
of Mark Rothko often consisted of large patches of color that seem to vibrate.
Abstract expressionists felt
alienated from their surrounding culture and used art to challenge society’s
conventions. The work of each artist was quite individual and distinctive, but
all the artists identified with the radicalism of artistic creativity. The
artists were eager to challenge conventions and limits on expression in order
to redefine the nature of art. Their radicalism came from liberating themselves
from the confining artistic traditions of the past.
The most notable activity took
place in New York City, which became one of the world’s most important art
centers during the second half of the 20th century. The radical fervor and
inventiveness of the abstract expressionists, their frequent association with
each other in New York City’s Greenwich Village, and the support of a group of
gallery owners and dealers turned them into an artistic movement. Also known as
the New York School, the participants included Barnett Newman, Robert
Motherwell, Franz Kline, and Arshile Gorky, in addition to Rothko and Pollock.
The members of the New York School came from diverse backgrounds such as the American Midwest and Northwest, Armenia, and Russia, bringing an international flavor to the group and its artistic
visions. They hoped to appeal to art audiences everywhere, regardless of
culture, and they felt connected to the radical innovations introduced earlier
in the 20th century by European artists such as Pablo Picasso and Marcel
Duchamp. Some of the artists—Hans Hofmann, Gorky, Rothko, and de Kooning—were
not born in the United States, but all the artists saw themselves as part of an
international creative movement and an aesthetic rebellion.
As artists felt released from
the boundaries and conventions of the past and free to emphasize expressiveness
and innovation, the abstract expressionists gave way to other innovative styles
in American art. Beginning in the 1930s Joseph Cornell created hundreds of
boxed assemblages, usually from found objects, with each based on a single
theme to create a mood of contemplation and sometimes of reverence. Cornell's
boxes exemplify the modern fascination with individual vision, art that breaks
down boundaries between forms such as painting and sculpture, and the use of
everyday objects toward a new end. Other artists, such as Robert Rauschenberg,
combined disparate objects to create large, collage-like sculptures known as
combines in the 1950s. Jasper Johns, a painter, sculptor, and printmaker,
recreated countless familiar objects, most memorably the American flag.
The most prominent American
artistic style to follow abstract expressionism was the pop art movement that
began in the 1950s. Pop art attempted to connect traditional art and popular
culture by using images from mass culture. To shake viewers out of their
preconceived notions about art, sculptor Claes Oldenburg used everyday objects
such as pillows and beds to create witty, soft sculptures. Roy Lichtenstein
took this a step further by elevating the techniques of commercial art, notably
cartooning, into fine art worthy of galleries and museums. Lichtenstein's
large, blown-up cartoons fill the surface of his canvases with grainy black
dots and question the existence of a distinct realm of high art. These artists
tried to make their audiences see ordinary objects in a refreshing new way,
thereby breaking down the conventions that formerly defined what was worthy of
artistic representation.
Probably the best-known pop artist, and a leader in
the movement, was Andy Warhol, whose images of a Campbell’s soup can and of the
actress Marilyn Monroe explicitly eroded the boundaries between the art world
and mass culture. Warhol also cultivated his status as a celebrity. He worked
in film as a director and producer to break down the boundaries between
traditional and popular art. Unlike the abstract expressionists, whose
conceptual works were often difficult to understand, Andy Warhol's pictures,
and his own face, were instantly recognizable.
Conceptual art, as it came to
be known in the 1960s, like its predecessors, sought to break free of
traditional artistic associations. In conceptual art, as practiced by Sol
LeWitt and Joseph Kosuth, concept takes precedent over actual object, by
stimulating thought rather than following an art tradition based on
conventional standards of beauty and artisanship.
Modern artists changed the
meaning of traditional visual arts and brought a new imaginative dimension to
ordinary experience. Art was no longer viewed as separate and distinct, housed
in museums as part of a historical inheritance, but as a continuous creative
process. This emphasis on constant change, as well as on the ordinary and
mundane, reflected a distinctly American democratizing perspective. Viewing art
in this way removed the emphasis from technique and polished performance, and
many modern artworks and experiences became more about expressing ideas than
about perfecting finished products.
Photography
Photography is probably the
most democratic modern art form because it can be, and is, practiced by most
Americans. Since 1888, when George Eastman developed the Kodak camera that
allowed anyone to take pictures, photography has struggled to be recognized as
a fine art form. In the early part of the 20th century, photographer, editor,
and artistic impresario Alfred Stieglitz established 291, a gallery in New York City, with fellow photographer Edward Steichen, to showcase the works of
photographers and painters. They also published a magazine called Camera
Work to increase awareness about photographic art. In the United States, photographic art had to compete with the widely available commercial
photography in news and fashion magazines. By the 1950s the tradition of
photojournalism, which presented news stories primarily with photographs, had
produced many outstanding works. In 1955 Steichen, who was director of
photography at the Museum of Modern Art in New York, called attention to this
work in an exhibition called The Family of Man.
Throughout the 20th century,
most professional photographers earned their living as portraitists or
photojournalists, not as artists. One of the most important exceptions was
Ansel Adams, who took majestic photographs of the Western American landscape. Adams used his art to stimulate social awareness and to support the conservation cause of
the Sierra Club. He helped found the photography department at the Museum of Modern Art in 1940, and six years later helped establish the photography
department at the California School of Fine Arts in San Francisco (now the San
Francisco Art Institute). He also held annual photography workshops at Yosemite National Park from 1955 to 1981 and wrote a series of influential books on
photographic technique.
Adams's elegant landscape photography was only
one small stream in a growing current of interest in photography as an art
form. Early in the 20th century, teacher-turned-photographer Lewis Hine
established a documentary tradition in photography by capturing actual people,
places, and events. Hine photographed urban conditions and workers, including
child laborers. Along with their artistic value, the photographs often
implicitly called for social reform. In the 1930s and 1940s, photographers
joined with other depression-era artists supported by the federal government to
create a photographic record of rural America. Walker Evans, Dorothea Lange,
and Arthur Rothstein, among others, produced memorable and widely reproduced
portraits of rural poverty and American distress during the Great Depression
and during the dust storms of the period.